<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bringing the conversation home &#8211; Google Sidewiki overview</title>
	<atom:link href="http://navigatecommunications.com/2009/10/26/bringing-the-conversation-home-google-sidewiki-overview/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://navigatecommunications.com/2009/10/26/bringing-the-conversation-home-google-sidewiki-overview/</link>
	<description>navigating the new communication climate</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 18:46:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Kadet</title>
		<link>http://navigatecommunications.com/2009/10/26/bringing-the-conversation-home-google-sidewiki-overview/#comment-42795</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Kadet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 16:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://navigatecommunications.com/?p=120#comment-42795</guid>
		<description>This is a useful overview, David. Overall, I see no reason why you wouldn&#039;t add a message to the site as an owner and keep an eye on this (you should talk to your employer about adding one on their site! :-) ).  I periodically survey client sites and those of sites you&#039;d think would have trouble with people posting bad things on their sites and have so far seen traction for Sidewiki -- I don&#039;t think most web users are that excited about it.  Even the Sidewiki&#039;s for companies like Microsoft and Wal-Mart are pretty tame. Still worth watching to see if it takes off during, say, a company&#039;s crisis or if they really screw up on something...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a useful overview, David. Overall, I see no reason why you wouldn&#8217;t add a message to the site as an owner and keep an eye on this (you should talk to your employer about adding one on their site! <img src='http://navigatecommunications.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  ).  I periodically survey client sites and those of sites you&#8217;d think would have trouble with people posting bad things on their sites and have so far seen traction for Sidewiki &#8212; I don&#8217;t think most web users are that excited about it.  Even the Sidewiki&#8217;s for companies like Microsoft and Wal-Mart are pretty tame. Still worth watching to see if it takes off during, say, a company&#8217;s crisis or if they really screw up on something&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Armato</title>
		<link>http://navigatecommunications.com/2009/10/26/bringing-the-conversation-home-google-sidewiki-overview/#comment-42790</link>
		<dc:creator>John Armato</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 15:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://navigatecommunications.com/?p=120#comment-42790</guid>
		<description>Great, helpful stuff, as usual, David. I have to admit, I find Sidewiki discomfiting. Since most web properties already have feedback mechanisms, this seems like an invitation to the malevolent more than anything else. I suppose it&#039;s one thing for a visitor to my home to leave me a nasty letter on my dining room table, but must he also be able to paint it across my garage door?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great, helpful stuff, as usual, David. I have to admit, I find Sidewiki discomfiting. Since most web properties already have feedback mechanisms, this seems like an invitation to the malevolent more than anything else. I suppose it&#8217;s one thing for a visitor to my home to leave me a nasty letter on my dining room table, but must he also be able to paint it across my garage door?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

